Social Security’s Income Inequality Crisis – Know Why Taxing the Rich May Not Solve the Problem

For tens of millions of retired Americans, Social Security is a financial cornerstone. Despite the average monthly retired-worker benefit being $1,976 in 2025, 80% to 90% of retirees rely on this income to cover their expenses. Given its importance, it’s concerning that Social Security’s financial outlook is far from stable. Among the many challenges it faces, rising income inequality stands out as a major contributor to the growing cash shortfall.

Funding Gap

The Social Security Board of Trustees annually evaluates the program’s financial health. Their 2024 report revealed a grim milestone: a projected 75-year funding shortfall of $23.2 trillion, up $800 billion from the previous year.

Although Social Security won’t go bankrupt or stop paying benefits, its current payout schedule, including cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), is unsustainable. If changes aren’t made, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund could deplete its $2.64 trillion reserves by 2033. This would result in a 21% reduction in benefits for retirees and survivors.

The funding deficit isn’t caused by popular myths like “congressional theft” or “undocumented immigrants collecting benefits.” Instead, demographic shifts, declining birth rates, reduced net legal migration, and widening income inequality are driving this financial crisis.

Income Inequality’s Role

Social Security is primarily funded by a 12.4% payroll tax on earned income, up to a cap of $176,100 in 2025. Employees and employers split this tax evenly, while self-employed individuals pay the full amount.

While 94% of American workers earn less than this cap, a small group of high earners exceeds it. Any income above the taxable earnings cap is exempt from payroll taxes. This exemption means Social Security isn’t capturing a growing share of national income as wages for top earners outpace the growth of the taxable earnings cap.

In 1983, 90% of earned income was subject to the payroll tax. By 2023, this figure had dropped to 83%. The gap reflects how income inequality is reducing the program’s revenue.

Raising Taxes

A straightforward solution might seem to be increasing or removing the taxable earnings cap. After all, 94% of workers wouldn’t be affected, and this change could immediately boost program revenues. However, there are complications.

1. Limited Longevity
   The Social Security Administration (SSA) estimated that eliminating the taxable earnings cap would extend the program’s solvency by only about 35 years. While helpful, it’s not a permanent fix.
2. Behavioral Adjustments
   Higher taxes on high earners might incentivize them to reduce their taxable income by retiring earlier, working fewer hours, or shifting income to tax-exempt streams.
3. Already Contributing Fairly
   Social Security caps both taxable income and maximum benefits. In 2025, the highest monthly benefit for a retiree at full retirement age is $4,018. This alignment arguably ensures high earners already contribute proportionally to the system.
4. Political Hurdles
   Changing the payroll tax requires amending the Social Security Act, which demands a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate. With Republican opposition to higher taxes on high earners, such proposals face significant challenges.

What’s Next?

Social Security’s financial challenges require a multifaceted solution. While taxing high earners might buy time, it’s insufficient on its own. Broader reforms, potentially including adjustments to benefits, retirement age, and tax policies, are needed to ensure the program’s long-term sustainability.

For retirees, maximizing their own benefits through strategic claiming decisions and knowing the program’s nuances is more crucial than ever. Social Security remains a vital safety net, but safeguarding its future will require bold action and compromise.

FAQs